Shoe Teasers |
Nopperabo
Viking
  

Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 554
 |
|
Well, Satsuki would be no problem, she's canonically 18 (the OVA after the series is literally their high school graduation.) But, I can certainly see where you are going. Kill la Kill has a LOT of sexual themes and nudity in it (the nudity is actually integral to the plot). And I agree that a lot of the characters do look a lot younger than they are. It's why I'm not sure I mentioned the in show shoe losses Mako had, since, while she IS 17, she looks like she's 13, or even 12. Ditto Jakuzure, is 18, looks about 10.
|
|
03-06-2023 15:08 |
|
|
grizzletoad1
Lord
 

Registration Date: 08-21-2013
Posts: 263
Location: New Jersey
Thread Starter
 |
|
Yeap. Most certainly qualifies. Good pick up.
|
|
08-26-2023 05:55 |
|
|
grizzletoad1
Lord
 

Registration Date: 08-21-2013
Posts: 263
Location: New Jersey
Thread Starter
 |
|
There are a lot of people who, for one reason or another don't like Gwenith Paltrow, and now I have one. Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. She's dressed throughout in a fantastic period 1940's skirt suit and a hat (although she seems to lose that early in the film) But despite being in several situations where she could have, should have, lost one of her nice high-heeled pumps, she never does. She even runs through a jungle in her heels, this years before Bryce Howard did her high heel thing in Jurasic Park. And she never caught the vitriol from the anti-high heel crowd like Bryce did! What a real shoe teaser! Too bad. She really did look great in that skirt suit, and would have looked even better after losing one of her shoes.
|
|
09-03-2023 03:52 |
|
|
omega
King
   

Registration Date: 11-05-2011
Posts: 811
 |
|
|
05-20-2024 15:55 |
|
|
CamiloS
Member
 
Registration Date: 10-14-2021
Posts: 33
Location: Argentina, buenos aires
 |
|
I loved. My favorite, she is Argentine
|
|
05-24-2024 06:54 |
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
    

Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,024
Location: NY
 |
|
quote: |
Originally posted by MerpserGuy
In Season 5, Episode 3 of the series Better Call Saul entitled The Guy for This, we see Rhea Seehorn portraying her character Kim Wexler and she is seen walking on the sand with heels on when she meets an old man at his front lawn. She actually does not lose a shoe in that scene and her heels did not even sink in the sand as she walks on it. You can see it in these two videos liked below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkWG37lr...PjGKNsldVmXsI_V
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fi0M-Th...xY9qcTnbHw5Xh4s
There were some shoe moments from Kim Wexler from BCS such as shoe close ups and she would have both of her shoes off in some episodes. But she did not have a one shoe off sequence in that series. |
Nice, but it always annoyed me that Kim never wore stockings. She's a lovely lady and a great character (love the entire BCS series, as well as BB), but she would have looked so much better and more professional if she wore stockings.
Lydia, from BB did always wear stockings. I think I vaguely a remember a scene where she went shoeless but can't remember which episode.
|
|
01-28-2025 09:41 |
|
|
omega
King
   

Registration Date: 11-05-2011
Posts: 811
 |
|
Well if you could get me a good screenshot of Kim wearing heels maybe I could make a one shoe scene with her.
|
|
02-18-2025 11:55 |
|
|
MerpserGuy
Forum Ace
   

Registration Date: 06-29-2021
Posts: 87
 |
|
|
02-18-2025 19:06 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|