 |
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
I'm assuming the her you mean is Jeharra; as of now from when I am watching, the older sister has only been in one episode (not counting a flashback) For her, I still love the "magnet" idea (actually that might be something they would actually do since one of the male bad guys wears armor shoes too, and none of them do) She also might take them off on purpose in some "soft" scene. it's part of the canon that she has a serios crush on the armored guy, and if there is ever something like a "love" card, I can easily see an episode of them doing mushy stuff, which could include things like barefoot walks on the beach. There alreay was an episode where we saw her in a bed, but like a lot of cartoon characters, she apparantly sleeps in her clothing, shoes included.
The sister is another matter. The magnet trick would not really work with her, since her shoes appear to be bronze, not iron (non magnetic) they are however a lot lower than Jeharra's, coming up only to the ankle, so they would be easier to lose. They sorta look like something you would expect to see on the feet of a female Gundam (actually I'm wondering if the animator has a shoe fetish himself, almost as soon as you meet her, there is a closeup of one of her feet as she puts her foot up on a rock to dust her shoe off.) but the only other thing I can think of, is if it turns out there is a "tickle" card (hey there have been wierder ones already there is already a laugh card and a sad card) Though that could get really dirty, really quick (it is a kids cartoon after all)
Edit:
Giving more bolter to my Magnet plan, todays episode sthowed that there actually is a "Thorn" card
Edit 2: and a "steel" card (steel, iron basically the same)
This post has been edited 2 time(s), it was last edited by Nopperabo: 04-22-2012 01:07.
|
|
03-28-2012 21:25 |
|
|
omega 
King
Registration Date: 11-05-2011
Posts: 785
|
|
|
|
05-12-2012 11:21 |
|
|
omega
King
Registration Date: 11-05-2011
Posts: 785
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012 10:34 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
|
|
09-01-2012 21:07 |
|
|
NapSuzuki
Newbie
Registration Date: 04-25-2012
Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
01-26-2013 23:53 |
|
|
|
abzapthane
Double Ace
Registration Date: 06-07-2012
Posts: 103
|
|
Not quite the one-shoe thing you were looking for, but the closest I've seen of her without her boots was an episode where she needed to see a therapist about smoking (I believe) and she is shown on the couch without her boots (black socks).
It doesn't show the removal, but you can see her boots lying nearby the couch she is lying on.
|
|
|
01-27-2013 07:38 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
|
|
02-04-2013 21:37 |
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
Another anime one to consider Akemi Homura from Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. There technically is already one of her losing one of her loafers while in her school clothes (I don't have a link, but someone on one of the other (non-shoe loss) forums I frequent uses it as part of his signiature) However what I was thinking of was one in her magical girl costume. Though I admit the main reason I'd like to see that is to see how the animators could pull it off since Homura wears what I call, for lack of a better word, "bootyhose" i.e. stockings/pantyhose that appear to have soles and heels built into them (If anyone remembers Seven of Nine from Star Trek, Voyager like that) in otherwords, losing them by normal means is more or less impossible. To do it, I guess they'd have to do a clothing destruction bit (i.e. the leg/foot part of one of the hose would have to tear off.
|
|
|
02-11-2013 15:31 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
Another anime one to consider Akemi Homura from Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. There technically is already one of her losing one of her loafers while in her school clothes (I don't have a link, but someone on one of the other (non-shoe loss) forums I frequent uses it as part of his signiature) However what I was thinking of was one in her magical girl costume. Though I admit the main reason I'd like to see that is to see how the animators could pull it off since Homura wears what I call, for lack of a better word, "bootyhose" i.e. stockings/pantyhose that appear to have soles and heels built into them (If anyone remembers Seven of Nine from Star Trek, Voyager like that) in otherwords, losing them by normal means is more or less impossible. To do it, I guess they'd have to do a clothing destruction bit (i.e. the leg/foot part of one of the hose would have to tear off. |
I'd love to see both of those. Do you know the episodes?
|
|
|
02-11-2013 20:01 |
|
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
Another anime one to consider Akemi Homura from Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. There technically is already one of her losing one of her loafers while in her school clothes (I don't have a link, but someone on one of the other (non-shoe loss) forums I frequent uses it as part of his signiature) However what I was thinking of was one in her magical girl costume. Though I admit the main reason I'd like to see that is to see how the animators could pull it off since Homura wears what I call, for lack of a better word, "bootyhose" i.e. stockings/pantyhose that appear to have soles and heels built into them (If anyone remembers Seven of Nine from Star Trek, Voyager like that) in otherwords, losing them by normal means is more or less impossible. To do it, I guess they'd have to do a clothing destruction bit (i.e. the leg/foot part of one of the hose would have to tear off. |
I'd love to see both of those. Do you know the episodes? |
What episodes? This is the shoe removal WISH list, the thread where we talk about what we would LIKE to see i.e. what we HAVEN'T seen yet. Those episodes DON'T EXIST. And if you mean the loss in her school uniform, that isn't an epsode it's just a piece of fanart; the person uses it as part of his banner.
|
|
|
02-12-2013 01:57 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
Another anime one to consider Akemi Homura from Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. There technically is already one of her losing one of her loafers while in her school clothes (I don't have a link, but someone on one of the other (non-shoe loss) forums I frequent uses it as part of his signiature) However what I was thinking of was one in her magical girl costume. Though I admit the main reason I'd like to see that is to see how the animators could pull it off since Homura wears what I call, for lack of a better word, "bootyhose" i.e. stockings/pantyhose that appear to have soles and heels built into them (If anyone remembers Seven of Nine from Star Trek, Voyager like that) in otherwords, losing them by normal means is more or less impossible. To do it, I guess they'd have to do a clothing destruction bit (i.e. the leg/foot part of one of the hose would have to tear off. |
I'd love to see both of those. Do you know the episodes? |
What episodes? This is the shoe removal WISH list, the thread where we talk about what we would LIKE to see i.e. what we HAVEN'T seen yet. Those episodes DON'T EXIST. And if you mean the loss in her school uniform, that isn't an epsode it's just a piece of fanart; the person uses it as part of his banner. |
Ah, I see. But yeah, I was referring to the one in her school uniform. Is there a way to link the fanart?
|
|
|
02-12-2013 02:58 |
|
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
Another anime one to consider Akemi Homura from Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. There technically is already one of her losing one of her loafers while in her school clothes (I don't have a link, but someone on one of the other (non-shoe loss) forums I frequent uses it as part of his signiature) However what I was thinking of was one in her magical girl costume. Though I admit the main reason I'd like to see that is to see how the animators could pull it off since Homura wears what I call, for lack of a better word, "bootyhose" i.e. stockings/pantyhose that appear to have soles and heels built into them (If anyone remembers Seven of Nine from Star Trek, Voyager like that) in otherwords, losing them by normal means is more or less impossible. To do it, I guess they'd have to do a clothing destruction bit (i.e. the leg/foot part of one of the hose would have to tear off. |
I'd love to see both of those. Do you know the episodes? |
What episodes? This is the shoe removal WISH list, the thread where we talk about what we would LIKE to see i.e. what we HAVEN'T seen yet. Those episodes DON'T EXIST. And if you mean the loss in her school uniform, that isn't an epsode it's just a piece of fanart; the person uses it as part of his banner. |
Ah, I see. But yeah, I was referring to the one in her school uniform. Is there a way to link the fanart? |
luckily I had it saved in my database
|
|
|
02-12-2013 06:01 |
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
Nice. Just wish there was a bigger version. Thanks 
.
|
|
|
02-12-2013 18:10 |
|
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
|
|
02-12-2013 19:32 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
It's interesting that you mention this. I remember, I was watching the disney movie tarzan. Everyone here knows about the scene where she loses her boot and stocking (1:45).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWyJ6irNMo
(I always wished she would have kept her stocking on in that scene. Oh well.)
But later on, when she's trying to climb off the tree, you can see her remaining boot "heel poppling" as if the black high heeled part of her boot is separating from the rest of her boot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfKS2iGeIxw
(0:22)
as it almost looks as though the black high heeled section of her boot is a seperate shoe that she wears over her boot. I wonder if those type of boots were actually designed like that.
|
|
|
02-12-2013 22:06 |
|
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
It's interesting that you mention this. I remember, I was watching the disney movie tarzan. Everyone here knows about the scene where she loses her boot and stocking (1:45).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWyJ6irNMo
(I always wished she would have kept her stocking on in that scene. Oh well.)
But later on, when she's trying to climb off the tree, you can see her remaining boot "heel poppling" as if the black high heeled part of her boot is separating from the rest of her boot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfKS2iGeIxw
(0:22)
as it almost looks as though the black high heeled section of her boot is a seperate shoe that she wears over her boot. I wonder if those type of boots were actually designed like that. |
I can confirm they were not. Two tone boots like that were a fairly popular fashion item of the time. the black patent bottom was sewn onto the lighter upper (which could be kidskin, regular leather, or cloth depedning on the make) take the bottom off and you basically have a collar with your foot poking out the bottom. I've awalys interpreted that scene as indicating that her other boot is now wrecked (or more likely that one of the animators wasn't familiar with how boots like that were constructed) . A similar effect was also sometimes gotten by wearing white spats over black boots (and indeed that is how the people at the Disney parks do it, as boots like that are no longer commonly made) , but it is fairly obvios Jane isn't doing that, you can see the inside of the boot she lost, and it is fairly obvios that is is an actual two tone boot (not to mention that, if they were just spats, she wouldn't have lost the boot in the first place, just the spat which would have simply pulled off. And of course there is the fact the monkey is able to balance the boot on his head shows the black part isn't seperate (if it was, it would fall off with no foot to hold it in place)
As I said before, the really odd thing is that she chose to wear boots like that to the jungle in he first place. Leaving aside the logic of wearing heels in the jungle, that kind of boot requires a buttonhook to put it on and take if off (the only reason the baboon was able to get it off is that he actually clawed the buttons on the side open) and then there is the matter of what to do if the buttons pop off (happened all the time) with laced boots, break a lace and you can thread in a new on replace it with a piece of string or a ribbon (both fairly common). Break off the buttons and you need replacement buttons, a special kind of hevy duty thread and special kind of needle etc.
|
|
|
02-12-2013 22:50 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
It's interesting that you mention this. I remember, I was watching the disney movie tarzan. Everyone here knows about the scene where she loses her boot and stocking (1:45).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWyJ6irNMo
(I always wished she would have kept her stocking on in that scene. Oh well.)
But later on, when she's trying to climb off the tree, you can see her remaining boot "heel poppling" as if the black high heeled part of her boot is separating from the rest of her boot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfKS2iGeIxw
(0:22)
as it almost looks as though the black high heeled section of her boot is a seperate shoe that she wears over her boot. I wonder if those type of boots were actually designed like that. |
I can confirm they were not. Two tone boots like that were a fairly popular fashion item of the time. the black patent bottom was sewn onto the lighter upper (which could be kidskin, regular leather, or cloth depedning on the make) take the bottom off and you basically have a collar with your foot poking out the bottom. I've awalys interpreted that scene as indicating that her other boot is now wrecked (or more likely that one of the animators wasn't familiar with how boots like that were constructed) . A similar effect was also sometimes gotten by wearing white spats over black boots (and indeed that is how the people at the Disney parks do it, as boots like that are no longer commonly made) , but it is fairly obvios Jane isn't doing that, you can see the inside of the boot she lost, and it is fairly obvios that is is an actual two tone boot (not to mention that, if they were just spats, she wouldn't have lost the boot in the first place, just the spat which would have simply pulled off. And of course there is the fact the monkey is able to balance the boot on his head shows the black part isn't seperate (if it was, it would fall off with no foot to hold it in place)
As I said before, the really odd thing is that she chose to wear boots like that to the jungle in he first place. Leaving aside the logic of wearing heels in the jungle, that kind of boot requires a buttonhook to put it on and take if off (the only reason the baboon was able to get it off is that he actually clawed the buttons on the side open) and then there is the matter of what to do if the buttons pop off (happened all the time) with laced boots, break a lace and you can thread in a new on replace it with a piece of string or a ribbon (both fairly common). Break off the buttons and you need replacement buttons, a special kind of hevy duty thread and special kind of needle etc. |
Thoroughly answered as usual Nop. If I had the time, I'd redraw each frame of that scene with her keeping her stocking on. That tickling scene later would have been so much better.
|
|
|
02-13-2013 08:01 |
|
|
|
Nopperabo
Viking
Registration Date: 12-31-2011
Posts: 549
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
It's interesting that you mention this. I remember, I was watching the disney movie tarzan. Everyone here knows about the scene where she loses her boot and stocking (1:45).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWyJ6irNMo
(I always wished she would have kept her stocking on in that scene. Oh well.)
But later on, when she's trying to climb off the tree, you can see her remaining boot "heel poppling" as if the black high heeled part of her boot is separating from the rest of her boot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfKS2iGeIxw
(0:22)
as it almost looks as though the black high heeled section of her boot is a seperate shoe that she wears over her boot. I wonder if those type of boots were actually designed like that. |
I can confirm they were not. Two tone boots like that were a fairly popular fashion item of the time. the black patent bottom was sewn onto the lighter upper (which could be kidskin, regular leather, or cloth depedning on the make) take the bottom off and you basically have a collar with your foot poking out the bottom. I've awalys interpreted that scene as indicating that her other boot is now wrecked (or more likely that one of the animators wasn't familiar with how boots like that were constructed) . A similar effect was also sometimes gotten by wearing white spats over black boots (and indeed that is how the people at the Disney parks do it, as boots like that are no longer commonly made) , but it is fairly obvios Jane isn't doing that, you can see the inside of the boot she lost, and it is fairly obvios that is is an actual two tone boot (not to mention that, if they were just spats, she wouldn't have lost the boot in the first place, just the spat which would have simply pulled off. And of course there is the fact the monkey is able to balance the boot on his head shows the black part isn't seperate (if it was, it would fall off with no foot to hold it in place)
As I said before, the really odd thing is that she chose to wear boots like that to the jungle in he first place. Leaving aside the logic of wearing heels in the jungle, that kind of boot requires a buttonhook to put it on and take if off (the only reason the baboon was able to get it off is that he actually clawed the buttons on the side open) and then there is the matter of what to do if the buttons pop off (happened all the time) with laced boots, break a lace and you can thread in a new on replace it with a piece of string or a ribbon (both fairly common). Break off the buttons and you need replacement buttons, a special kind of hevy duty thread and special kind of needle etc. |
Thoroughly answered as usual Nop. If I had the time, I'd redraw each frame of that scene with her keeping her stocking on. That tickling scene later would have been so much better. |
But the plot wouldn't. The key part there is Tarzan realizing that Jane and himself are of the same species, that she is "like him". part of that is seeing that her naked foot is the same sort of foot as he has (that's important, when you consider that gorlillas are NOT going to have feet like his, their feet are handlike same as most apes. The foot leads to the glove/palm touch scene. If Jane still had her stocking, Tarzan probably wouldn't have made the connection and the movie falls apart. I think you are falling into the "make everything follow my desire, whether it makes sense or not" trap
|
|
|
02-13-2013 13:37 |
|
|
|
Mandrake
Administrator
Registration Date: 03-03-2010
Posts: 1,001
Location: NY
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nopperabo
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mandrake
It's interesting that you mention this. I remember, I was watching the disney movie tarzan. Everyone here knows about the scene where she loses her boot and stocking (1:45).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWyJ6irNMo
(I always wished she would have kept her stocking on in that scene. Oh well.)
But later on, when she's trying to climb off the tree, you can see her remaining boot "heel poppling" as if the black high heeled part of her boot is separating from the rest of her boot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfKS2iGeIxw
(0:22)
as it almost looks as though the black high heeled section of her boot is a seperate shoe that she wears over her boot. I wonder if those type of boots were actually designed like that. |
I can confirm they were not. Two tone boots like that were a fairly popular fashion item of the time. the black patent bottom was sewn onto the lighter upper (which could be kidskin, regular leather, or cloth depedning on the make) take the bottom off and you basically have a collar with your foot poking out the bottom. I've awalys interpreted that scene as indicating that her other boot is now wrecked (or more likely that one of the animators wasn't familiar with how boots like that were constructed) . A similar effect was also sometimes gotten by wearing white spats over black boots (and indeed that is how the people at the Disney parks do it, as boots like that are no longer commonly made) , but it is fairly obvios Jane isn't doing that, you can see the inside of the boot she lost, and it is fairly obvios that is is an actual two tone boot (not to mention that, if they were just spats, she wouldn't have lost the boot in the first place, just the spat which would have simply pulled off. And of course there is the fact the monkey is able to balance the boot on his head shows the black part isn't seperate (if it was, it would fall off with no foot to hold it in place)
As I said before, the really odd thing is that she chose to wear boots like that to the jungle in he first place. Leaving aside the logic of wearing heels in the jungle, that kind of boot requires a buttonhook to put it on and take if off (the only reason the baboon was able to get it off is that he actually clawed the buttons on the side open) and then there is the matter of what to do if the buttons pop off (happened all the time) with laced boots, break a lace and you can thread in a new on replace it with a piece of string or a ribbon (both fairly common). Break off the buttons and you need replacement buttons, a special kind of hevy duty thread and special kind of needle etc. |
Thoroughly answered as usual Nop. If I had the time, I'd redraw each frame of that scene with her keeping her stocking on. That tickling scene later would have been so much better. |
But the plot wouldn't. The key part there is Tarzan realizing that Jane and himself are of the same species, that she is "like him". part of that is seeing that her naked foot is the same sort of foot as he has (that's important, when you consider that gorlillas are NOT going to have feet like his, their feet are handlike same as most apes. The foot leads to the glove/palm touch scene. If Jane still had her stocking, Tarzan probably wouldn't have made the connection and the movie falls apart. I think you are falling into the "make everything follow my desire, whether it makes sense or not" trap |
It still could have served the plot if her stocking got torn during the tickling. And this is the wish list thread, so of course I'm going to write "what follows my desire".
|
|
|
02-13-2013 16:59 |
|
|
|
|
  |
|
|
